CSET Practice Test Subtest II Science
Jul
20
Filed Under CSET Multiple Subject | Leave a Comment
10. Which law of energy states that entropy always increases?
A. Zeroth law of thermodynamics
B. First law of thermodynamics
C. Second law of thermodynamics
D. Third law of thermodynamics
Thermal Conductivity
In a conductor, electric current can flow freely, in an
insulator it cannot. Metals such as copper typify
conductors, while most non-metallic solids are said
to be good insulators, having extremely high
resistance to the flow of charge through them.
"Conductor" implies that the outer electrons of the
atoms are loosely bound and free to move through
the material. Most atoms hold on to their electrons
tightly and are insulators. In copper, the valence
electrons are essentially free and strongly repel each
other. Any external influence which moves one of
them will cause a repulsion of other electrons which
propagates, "domino fashion" through the conductor.
Simply stated, most metals are good electrical
conductors, most nonmetals are not. Metals are
also generally good heat conductors while nonmetals
are not.
Heat transfer by conduction involves transfer of
energy within a material without any motion of the
material as a whole. The rate of heat transfer depends
upon the temperature gradient and the thermal
conductivity of the material. Thermal conductivity is
a reasonably straightforward concept when you are
discussing heat loss through the walls of your house,
and you can find tables which characterize the
building materials and allow you to make reasonable
calculations.
More fundamental questions arise when you examine
the reasons for wide variations in thermal conductivity.
Gases transfer heat by direct collisions between
molecules, and as would be expected, their thermal
conductivity is low compared to most solids since
they are dilute media. Non-metallic solids transfer
heat by lattice vibrations so that there is no net
motion of the media as the energy propagates
through. Such heat transfer is often described in
terms of "phonons", quanta of lattice vibrations.
Metals are much better thermal conductors than
non-metals because the same mobile electrons
which participate in electrical conduction also take
part in the transfer of heat.
Conceptually, the thermal conductivity can be
thought of as the container for the medium-dependent
properties which relate the rate of heat loss per unit
area to the rate of change of temperature.
For an ideal gas the heat transfer rate is proportional
to the average molecular velocity, the mean free path,
and the molar heat capacity of the gas.
For non-metallic solids, the heat transfer is view as
being transferred via lattice vibrations, as atoms
vibrating more energetically at one part of a solid
transfer that energy to less energetic neighboring
atoms. This can be enhanced by cooperative motion
in the form of propagating lattice waves, which in the
quantum limit are quantized as phonons. Practically,
there is so much variability for non-metallic solids that
we normally just characterize the substance with a
measured thermal conductivity when doing ordinary
calculations.
For metals, the thermal conductivity is quite high,
and those metals which are the best electrical
conductors are also the best thermal conductors.
At a given temperature, the thermal and electrical
conductivities of metals are proportional, but raising
the temperature increases the thermal conductivity
while decreasing the electrical conductivity.
Qualitatively, this relationship is based upon the fact
that the heat and electrical transport both involve the
free electrons in the metal. The thermal conductivity
increases with the average particle velocity since that
increases the forward transport of energy. However, the
electrical conductivity decreases with particle velocity
increases because the collisions divert the electrons
from forward transport of charge. This means that the
ratio of thermal to electrical conductivity depends upon
the average velocity squared, which is proportional to
the kinetic temperature.
Is there a relationship between electrical conductivity
and thermal conductivity?
There is a relationship for metals and it is known as
the Wiedemann-Franz law. Metals are good electrical
conductors because there are lots of free charges in
them. The free charges are usually negative electrons,
but in some metals, e.g., tungsten, they are positive
'holes.' For purposes of discussion, let's assume we have
free electron charges.
When a voltage difference exists between two points
in a metal, it creates an electric field which causes the
electrons to move, i.e., it causes a current. Of course,
the electrons bump into some of the stationary atoms
(actually, 'ion cores') of the metal and this frictional
'resistance' tends to slow them down. The resistance
depends on the specific type of metal we're dealing
with. E.g., the friction in silver is much less than it is in
iron. The greater the distance an electron can travel
without bumping into an ion core, the smaller is the
resistance, i.e., the greater is the electrical conductivity.
The average distance an electron can travel without
colliding is called the 'mean free path.' But there's
another factor at work too. The electrons which are
free to respond to the electric field have a thermal
speed a sizable percentage of the speed of light, but
since they travel randomly with this high speed, they
go nowhere on average, i.e., this thermal speed itself
doesn't create any current.
The thermal conductivity of this metal is, like electrical
conductivity, determined largely by the free electrons.
Suppose now that the metal has different temperatures
at its ends. The electrons are moving slightly faster at
the hot end and slower at the cool end. The faster
electrons transmit energy to the cooler, slower ones by
colliding with them, and just as for electrical conductivity,
the longer the mean free path, the faster the energy
can be transmitted, i.e., the greater the thermal
conductivity. But the rate is also determined by the
very high thermal speed-the higher the speed, the
more rapidly does heat energy flow(i.e., the more
rapidly collisions occur). In fact, the thermal conductivity
is directly proportional to the product of the mean free
path and thermal speed.
Both thermal and electrical conductivity depend in the
same way on not just the mean free path, but also on
other properties such as electron mass and even the
number of free electrons per unit volume. But as we
have seen, they depend differently on the thermal speed
of the electrons-electrical conductivity is inversely
proportional to it and thermal conductivity is directly
proportional to it. The upshot is that the ratio of thermal
to electrical conductivity depends primarily on the square
of the thermal speed. But this square is proportional to
the temperature, with the result that the ratio depends
on temperature, T, and two physical constants:
Boltzmann's constant, k, and the electron charge, e.
Boltzmann's constant is, in this context, a measure of
how much kinetic energy an electron has per degree of
temperature.
Putting it all together, the ratio of thermal to electrical
conductivity is:
( 2 / 3 ) * ( (k/e)2 ) * T
the value of the constant multiplying T being: 2.45x10-8
W-ohm-K-squared.
11. The relationship between electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity in metals is known as:
A. Wiedemann-Franz law
B. Quanta of lattice vibrations
C. Boltzmann’s constant
D. Ion cores
Plants and Gravity
Humans have always been mesmerized by the thought
of space travel and inhabiting other worlds. But if we
are going to be successful colonists, we need to be
self-sufficient and that includes knowing how to grow
crops in space. Here's why: Future astronauts will
need food, oxygen and water to sustain themselves,
and plants can provide these basic needs. Plants are
a source of food, turn carbon dioxide into oxygen
and they can absorb and hold water. But to make the
leap into space gardening, NASA has had to struggle
with some fascinating problems. To date, they've
come a long way in their discoveries. Here's what
they've learned so far:
Garden Troubles in Space
On Earth, plants need gravity, water, carbon dioxide,
soil, light and pollination to survive. The lack of these
elements in space causes several problems.
1. Gravity and Seeds: In an orbiting ship, plants don't
have the constant downward pull of gravity, and that
often confuses their orientation. For example, the stalk
will sometimes grow the same way as their roots. Also,
plant cell development and function is slower than
normal, and most cells do not grow to maturity.
2. Gravity and Water: Here on earth, gravity forces
water down to the roots, where the plant absorbs it.
But in space, watering becomes difficult because zero
gravity causes the water to spread out evenly in a
horizontal layer through the soil-like material, making
it difficult to reach the roots. Or worse, the water
may form a ball and not move towards the roots at
all.
3. Natural Atmosphere: In space, there is less natural
air circulating, so plants could literally suffocate on
their own "exhaled" oxygen. Scientists have to provide
special containers with fans or air pumps for
experimentation to keep the air moving. Future crops
will have to live within a controlled environment, much
like a greenhouse.
4. Soil: Soil on other planets will differ from that on
Earth's, so researchers carefully try to mimic soils on
other planets and still make sure plants get the
nutrients they need.
5. Light: In an orbiting station, plants in a window
would get a pattern of 45 minutes of light, and 45
minutes of darkness, so artificial light is needed to
simulate normal Earth conditions. Otherwise, without
their normal daylight cycle, plants can't manufacture
enough food to survive, because photosynthesis is
thwarted.
6. Pollination: Plants rely heavily on bees and other
insects to spread the pollen from flower to flower so
they can repopulate. But in space, there are no
insects to rely upon. Furthermore, insects studied
aboard spacecrafts have had very difficult times
adapting to the zero gravity environment. Researchers
are forced to devise alternative methods of pollination
or rely on self-pollinating or asexual plants.
Source:
Excerpt from an article entitled "2001: A Gardening
Odyssey For future space travelers, gardening will be
a matter of survival" By Tiffany McKinnon. Special
thanks to Homestore.com, visit them on the web for
all your home gardening needs.Popularity: 88% [?]
Continue Lesson - Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Did you find this lesson helpful? Would you like to be alerted when a new lesson like this is posted?
Subscribe to ACE the CSET Blog
What is RSS?
| Or, Subscribe via email: | |
| |
Comments
Leave a Reply

sofia lizarraga on
susan on
jolly on
Makalee on
J on
Angela Edwards on
Camala Fowler on
Ms. M on
K on
bethany on
pegah habibian on
Peter Lorison on
Lan on